A CHRISTIAN VIEW OF THE HOLOCAUST
 |
Willard Hotel
|
(applause)
[Freedman's speech]
What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able to learn from any other source, and what I tell you now concerns not only you, but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity. I'm not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I'm here to tell you things that will help you preserve what you consider the most sacred things in the world: the liberty, and the freedom, and the right to live as Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to pursue the things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as Christians.
Now, first of all, I'd like to tell you that on
August 25th 1960 — that was shortly before elections — Senator Kennedy,
who is now the President of the United States, went to New York, and
delivered an address to the Zionist Organization of America. In that
address, to reduce it to its briefest form, he stated that he would use
the armed forces of the United States to preserve the existence of the
regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists who are now in occupation of
that area.
In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked
out of their homes, away from their families, and sent abroad to fight
in Palestine against the Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to
return to their homes. And these Christian boys are going to be asked to
shoot to kill these innocent [Arab Palestinians] people who only want
to follow out fifteen resolutions passed by the United Nations in the
last twelve years calling upon the Zionists to allow these people to
return to their homes.
Now, when United States troops appear in the
Middle East to fight with the Zionists as their allies to prevent the
return of these people who were evicted from their homes in the 1948
armed insurrection by the Zionists who were transplanted there from
Eastern Europe... when that happens, the United States will trigger
World War III.
You say, when will that take place? The answer
is, as soon as the difficulty between France and Algeria has been
settled, that will take place. As soon as France and Algeria have been
settled, that will take place. As soon as France and Algeria have
settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem world, has
no more war on their hands with France, they are going to move these
people back into their homes, and when they do that and President
kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on
to what they stole from innocent men, women and children, we will
trigger World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we cannot
emerge from that war a victor. We are going to lose that war because
there is not one nation in the world that will let one of their sons
fight with us for such a cause.
I know and speak to these ambassadors in
Washington and the United Nations — and of the ninety-nine nations
there, I've consulted with maybe seventy of them — and when we go to war
in Palestine to help the thieves retain possession of what they have
stolen from these innocent people we're not going to have a man there to
fight with us as our ally.
And who will these people
have supporting them, you ask. Well, four days after President Kennedy —
or he was then Senator Kennedy — made that statement on August 28,
1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in Lebanon and there they
decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the government of Palestine, which
has been dormant more or less, since the 1948 armed insurrection by the
Zionists.
Not only that... they ordered the creation of the
Palestine Army, and they are now drilling maybe a half a million
soldiers in that area of the world to lead these people back to their homeland.
With them, they have as their allies all the nations of what is termed
the Bandung Conference Group. That includes the Soviet Union and every
Soviet Union satellite. It includes Red China; it includes every
independent country in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of the world's
total population. Eighty percent of the world's population. Four out
of five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war
with us. And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on
the face of this earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the
world and they are the non-Caucasians... the non-white nations of the
world, and that's what we face.
And what is the reason? The reason is that here in
the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete
control of our government. For many reasons too many and too complex to
go into here at this — time I'll be glad to answer questions, however,
to support that statement — the Zionists and their co-religionists rule
this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this
country.
Now, you say, 'well, that's a very broad statement
to make', but let me show what happened while you were — I don't want
to wear that out — let me show what happened while WE were all asleep. I'm including myself with you. We were all asleep. What happened?
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914.
Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which World War One broke
out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war
was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the
other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened?
Within two years Germany had won that war: not
alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines,
which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the
Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her
soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply facing her — and
after that, starvation.
At that time, the French army had mutinied. They
lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on
the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their
toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't
like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.
Now Germany — not a shot had been fired on the
German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany.
And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered
England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante
basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it
was before the war started.”
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was
considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either
accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering
them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany,
who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British
War Cabinet and — I am going to be brief because this is a long story,
but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if
anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at all
possible — the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and
they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to
give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you
now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in
as your ally.”
The United States was not in the war at that time.
We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They
[Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States
into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will
promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
In other words, they made this deal: “We will get
the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us
is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
Now England had as much right to promise Palestine
to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland
for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain —
that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is
known as Palestine — should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the
Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.
However, they made that promise, in October of
1916. October, nineteen hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that — I
don't know how many here remember it — the United States, which was
almost totally pro-German — totally pro-German — because the newspapers
here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of
mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they
were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from
Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.
The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't
want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers — the German-Jews —
Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused
to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood
aside and they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with
Russia, not one cent!” But they poured money into Germany, they fought
with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility
of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At
that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from
red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where
they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was
having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of
a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were
Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off
babies' hands. And they were no good.
Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent these cables to the
United States, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson.
We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you
go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war."
And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war. We
had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we
have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.
Now the war — World War One
— in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to
be our war. We went in there — we were railroaded into it — if I can be
vulgar, we were suckered into — that war merely so that the Zionists of
the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the
people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why
we went into World War One. Now, what happened?
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to
Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the
agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are
going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.”
Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or
another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The
receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic
language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about.
And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's
promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration
for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour
Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three
dollar bill. And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than
that.
Now, that is where all the trouble started. The
United States went in the war. The United States crushed Germany. We
went in there, and it's history. You know what happened. Now, when the
war was ended, and the Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace
Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation
representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought
to know. Now what happened?
The Jews at that peace conference, when they were
cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that
claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said,
“How about Palestine for us?” And they produced, for the first time to
the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the
Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, that was the game! That's
why the United States came into the war.” And the Germans for the first
time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific
reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted
Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.
Now, that brings us to another very interesting
point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up
to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the
world than they had been in Germany.
You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100
times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this
country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the
North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr.
Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had
the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers — the biggest
in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question
about that. Now, the Germans felt: “Well, that was quite a sellout.”
It was a sellout that I can best compare — suppose
the United States was at war today with the Soviet Union. And we were
winning. And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let's quit. We offer you
peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing.” And all of a sudden Red
China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing
them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with
reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out
that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all
the time we thought they were loyal citizens working with us, were
selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red
China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, in the
United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would
dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be lampposts enough,
convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these
Jews. "We've been so nice to them"; and from 1905 on, when the first
Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out
of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And
they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany down the
river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a
so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Now, Nahum Sokolow — all the great leaders, the big
names that you read about in connection with Zionism today — they, in
1919, 1920, '21, '22, and '23, they wrote in all their papers — and the
press was filled with their statements — that "the feeling against the
Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great
defeat was brought about by our intercession and bringing the United
States into the war against them."
The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that
the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted
better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious
feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account
of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It
was anything but religious.
Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home
and pulled down the shades and said “Shema' Yisrael” or “Our Father.”
No one cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States.
Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing:
that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat,
for no reason at all, because World War One was started against Germany
for no reason for which they [Germans] were responsible. They were
guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy.
They built up world trade.
You must remember, Germany, at the time of
Napoleon, at the time of the French Revolution, what was the German
Reich consisted of 300 — three hundred! — small city-states,
principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred little separate
political entities. And between that time, between the period of. . .
between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state.
And within 50 years after that time they became one of the world's great
powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing
business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and make
better products. And what happened? What happened as a result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France,
and Russia that: "We must slap down Germany", because there isn't one
historian in the world that can find a valid reason why those three
countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically. Now, what
happened after that?
When Germany realized that the Jews were
responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair
on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor
Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret
papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a
State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew who Cordell
Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of
political prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very fine
condition.
They were in excellent shape; everybody treated
well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were
Jews, because the Jews happened to be maybe 98 per cent of the
Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there,
and ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and others who had
international affiliations.
Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on
this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they
had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.
So they did take appropriate action against them
[against the Jews]. They. . . shall I say, discriminated against them
wherever they could? They shunned them. The same as we would the
Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who
had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.
Now, after a while, the Jews of the world didn't
know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every
country in the world attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany:
“You fire Hitler! And you put every Jew back into his former position,
whether he was a Communist, no matter what he was. You can't treat us
that way! And we, the Jews of the world, are calling upon you, and
serving this ultimatum upon you.” Well, the Germans told them. . . you
can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do?
They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name
means anything to people here. . . (You want to ask a question? —- Uh,
there were no Communists in Germany at that time. they were called
'Social Democrats.)
Well, I don't want to go by what they were called.
We're now using English words, and what they were called in Germany is
not very material. . . but they were Communists, because in 1917, the
Communists took over Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl
Liebknecht, and a group of Jews in Germany took over the government for
three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland
because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as
they did Russia, and that he was going to meet the same fate that the
Czar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland for safety and for
security.
Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in
Germany was quashed, it was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying
to get back into their former — their status — and the Germans fought
them in every way they could, without hurting a hair on anyone's head.
The same as one group, the Prohibitionists, fought the people who were
interested in liquor, and they didn't fight one another with pistols,
they did it every way they could.
Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews
in Germany. And, at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million
Germans and there were only 460,000 Jews. . . less than one half of one
percent of Germany were Jews. And yet, they controlled all of the
press, they controlled most of the economy, because they had come in and
with cheap money — you know the way the Mark was devalued — they bought
up practically everything.
Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender,
mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up
and Mr. Untermeyer
came back to the United States — who was the head of the American
delegation and the president of the whole conference — and he went from
the steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United
States in which he said:
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food
supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the
proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not
export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There
just was not enough food for more than one third of the population.
 |
Click to enlarge
|
Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page — a whole page — in the New York Times on August 7, 1933,
Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that: “this economic boycott is our
means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in
the NRA" . [National Recovery Administration] — which some of you may
remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless they followed the
rules laid down by the New Deal, which of course was declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time.
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a
boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find
one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in
Germany" on it.
In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company
told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and
dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted. If anyone came
in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with
signs: "Hitler", "murderer", and so forth, and like — something like
these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.
R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called
Strauss who also happen to be Jews. . . a woman found stockings there
which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany". Well, they were
cotton stockings. They may have been there 20 years, because since I've
been observing women's legs in the last twenty years, I haven't seen a
pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy! I saw Macy boycotted,
with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "MURDERS" and
"HITLERITES", and so forth.
Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of
any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no
starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.
Now, that. . . naturally, the Germans said, "Why,
who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our
people out of work, and our industries come to a standstill? Who are
they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they
painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.
Why should a German go in and give their money to a
storekeeper who was part of a boycott who was going to starve Germany
into surrender into the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who
their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
That continued for some time, and it wasn't until
1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in
Paris and shot one of the officials [a German official] that the Germans
really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found
them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.
Now, for anyone to say that — I don't like to use
the word 'anti-Semitism' because it's meaningless, but it means
something to you still, so I'll have to use it — the only reason that
there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were
responsible: number one, for World War One; number two, for this
world-wide boycott, and number three — did I say for World War One, they
were responsible? For the boycott — and also for World War II, because
after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the
Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to
survive.
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I
knew that the Germans had decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian
or Communist: there is no in between. It's going to be Christian or
it's going to be Communist. And the Germans decided: "We're going to
keep it Christian if possible". And they started to re-arm.
And there intention was — by that time the United
States had recognized the Soviet Union, which they did in November, 1933
— the Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized:
"Well, our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same
as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon,
unless we are strong."
And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion
dollars of your money for defense, they say. Defense against whom?
Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and
then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other
governments of the world.
Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a
Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that
staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in
terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million
tons of TNT. One million tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our nuclear
bombs have a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That
was when they were first developed five or six years ago. Now, the
nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons,
and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union
have.
So, what do we face now? If we trigger a world
war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why
will it take place? It will take place because Act III. . . the curtain
goes up on Act III. Act I was World War I. Act II was World War II.
Act III is going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their
co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again
use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their
foothold for their world government. Now, that is just as true as I am
standing here, because not alone have I read it, but many here have
read it, and it's known all over the world.
Now, what are we going to do? The life you save
may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight;
and you you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London
the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons
to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the
United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it.
Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel
House knew it. Other 's knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good
idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in
the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk
around the office there.
I was 'confidential man' to Henry Morgenthau, Sr.,
who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between
him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with
President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I
heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax
and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also indoctrinate him with
the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as
close as the two fingers on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was
just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a
newborn baby. And that's how they got us into World War I, while we all
slept.
Now, at this moment... at this moment they may be
planning this World War III, in which we don't stand a chance even if
they don't use nuclear bombs. How can the United States — about five
percent of the world — go out and fight eighty to ninety percent of the
world on their home ground? How can we do it... send our boys over
there to be slaughtered? For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as
their 'commonwealth'? They've fooled you so much that you don't know
whether you're coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says,
"Gentlemen, any witness that you find has told a single lie, you can
disregard all his testimony." That is correct.
I don't know from what state you come, but in New York state that is
the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie,
disregard his testimony.
Now, what are the facts about the Jews?
The Jews — I call them Jews to you, because they
are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews. I refer to them as so-called
Jews, because I know what they are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn't a
Jew in the world today, and if those people are Jews, certainly our Lord
and Savior was not one of them, and I can prove that.
Now what happened? The eastern European Jews, who
form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call
themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.
They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the
heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove
them out of Asia into eastern Europe — and to reduce this so you don't
get too confused about the history of Eastern Europe — they set up this
big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square miles. Only, there was no Russia,
there were no other countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest
country in all Europe — so big and so powerful that when the other
monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000
soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.
Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is
filthy. I don't want to go into the details of that now. It was their
religion the way it was the religion of many other Pagans or Barbarians
elsewhere in the world.
Now, the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with
the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called
monotheistic faith — either Christianity, Islam — the Moslem faith — or
what is known today as Judaism — really Talmudism. So, like spinning a
top and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called
Judaism. And that became the state religion.
He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita
and Sura and brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings,
and opened up synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people —
800,000 thousand square miles — and maybe ten to twenty million people;
and they became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them that had an
ancestor that ever put a toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old
Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them!
And yet they come to the Christians and they ask us to support their
armed insurrection in Palestine by saying:
"Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God's chosen people to their Promised Land, their ancestral homeland, It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."
Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted
just the same as the Irish [were converted]. And it's just as
ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be. . .
there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty four million! And,
Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54 million Chinese have
accepted Islam as their religious belief.
Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from
Arabia, where the city of Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born. . .
imagine if the 54 million Chinese called themselves 'Arabs'. Imagine!
Why, you'd say they're lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54
million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a
religious faith; a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.
The same as the Irish. When the Irish became
Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported from the Holy
Land a new crop of inhabitants that were Christians. They weren't
different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted
Christianity as a religious faith.
Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these
Turko-Finns. . . they were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia
into eastern Europe. They likewise, because their king took the faith —
Talmudic faith — they had no choice. Just the same as in Spain: If
the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had
to get out of Spain. So everybody — they lived on the land just like
the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the land under their
feudal system — so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews!
Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians. .
. for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going
to use our power, our prestige to repatriate God's chosen people to
their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land."
Now, could there be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than that?
And because they control the newspapers, the
magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, they
have the ministers in the pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap
boxes talking the same language . . . so naturally you'd believe black
is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black
anymore — you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.
Now, that is one of the great lies. . . that is
the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Because
after two wars fought in Europe — World War I and World War II — if it
wasn't possible for them to live in peace and harmony with the people in
Europe, like their brethren are living in the United States, what were
the two wars fought for? Did they have to — like you flush the toilet —
because they couldn't get along, did they have to say, "Well, we're
going back to our homeland and you Christians can help us"?
I can't understand yet how the Christians in
Europe could have been that dumb because every theologian, every history
teacher, knew the things that I'm telling you. But, they naturally
bribed them, shut them up with money, stuffed their mouths with money,
and now. . . I don't care whether you know all this or not. It doesn't
make any difference to me whether you know all these facts or not, but
it does make a difference to me. I've got, in my family, boys that will
have to be in the next war, and I don't want them to go and fight and
die... like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they've
died all over the world. For what?
To help crooks hold on to what they stole from
innocent people who had been in peaceful possession of that land, those
farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of years? Is that
why the United States must go to war? Because the Democratic Party
wants New York State — the electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral
vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?... which are controlled by
the Zionists and their co-religionists?. . . the balance of power?
In New York City there are 400,000 members of the
liberal party, all Zionists and their co-religionists. And New York
State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes. Now, I don't blame Mr.
Kennedy. I'm fond of Mr. Kennedy. I think he's a great man. I think
he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts to him.
And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate
he knows. He's playing with the enemy. Like when you go fishing,
you've got to play with the fish. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. Let 'em
out and pull 'em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy's father, and how well
informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to his
father, I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
But I do think that it is the duty of every
mother, every loyal Christian , every person that regards the defense of
this country as a sacred right, that they communicate — not with their
congressman, not with their senator, but with President Kennedy. And
tell him, "I do not think you should send my boy, or our boys, wearing
the uniform of the United States of America, and under the flag that you
see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to help keep in the
hands of these that which they have stolen". I think everyone should
not alone write once, but keep writing and get your friends to write.
Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these
things to support what I have just asked you to do. But I don't think
it's necessary to do that. You're above the average group in
intelligence and I don't think it's necessary to impress this any more.
But. . . I want to tell you one more thing. You
talk about... "Oh, the Jews. Why the Jews? Christianity. Why, we got
Christianity from the Jews and the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave
us our religion". But do you know that on the day of atonement that
you think is so sacred to them, that on that day... and I was one of
them! This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm
here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a
synagogue, the very first prayer that you recite, you stand — and it's
the only prayer for which you stand — and you repeat three times a short
prayer. The Kol Nidre.
In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any
oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months —
any oath, vow or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months
shall be null and void.
The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not
be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force and
effect, and so forth and so on.
And further than that, the Talmud teaches: "Don't
forget — whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge — remember the Kol
Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts
you from fulfilling that".
How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can
depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in
1916.
And we're going to suffer the same fate as Germany
suffered, and for the same reason. You can't depend upon something as
insecure as the leadership that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow
or pledge. Now I could go on and recite many other things to you, but I
would have a little respect for your time, and you want to really, uh,
get through with all of this. Tomorrow's going to be a long day.
Now I want to say one thing. You ask me. . . well,
you think to yourself: "well how did this fellow get mixed up in this
the way he got mixed up in it." Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I
took big pages in newspapers and tried to tell the American people what
I'm telling you. And one newspaper after another refused the
advertisement. And when I couldn't find a newspaper to take them — I
paid cash, not credit — what happened? My lawyer told me, "There's an
editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take your announcement".
So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley, and that's how I met him.
So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me,
who was the son of the Dean of the Methodist Bishop, he said: "Well, I
think he's a little anti-Semitic. I don't know whether I can get him
over here. So he brought him over to my apartment and we hit it off
wonderfully, and have since then.
Now, I say this, and I say it without any
qualifications. I say it without any reservations. And I say it
without any hesitation. . . if it wasn't for the work that Mr. Conley
McGinley did with "Common Sense" — he's been sending out from 1,800,000
to 2,000,000 every year — if it wasn't for the work he's been doing
sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be a communist
country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the other
active persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time
through "Common Sense".
Now, I have been very active in helping him all I
could. I'm not as flush as I was. I cannot go on spending the money. .
. I'm not going to take up a collection. Don't worry. I see five
people getting up to leave. (laughter)
I haven't got the money that I used to spend. I
used to print a quarter of a million of them out of my own pocket and
send them out. Mr. McGinley, when I first met him, had maybe 5,000
printed and circulated them locally. So I said, "With what you know and
what I know, we can really do a good job". So I started printing in
outside shops of big newspaper companies, a quarter of a million, and
paid for them. Well, there's always a bottom to the barrel. I suppose
we've all reached that at times.
I'm not so poor that I can't live without working
and that's what worries the Anti-Defamation League. I can just get by
without going and asking for a job or getting on the bread line. But
Mr. McGinley is working. He's sick and he's going at this stronger than
ever. And all I want to say is that they want to close up "Common
Sense" more than any other single thing in the whole world, as a
death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive.
So I just want to tell you this. All they do is
circulate rumors: "Mr. Benjamin H. Freedman is the wealthy backer of
'Common Sense'." The reason they do that is to discourage the people
in the United States: don't send any money to Common Sense. They don't
need it. The've got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as a backer. That all has
strategy. They don't want to advertise me so that people that have
real estate or securities to sell will come and call on me. They just
want people to lay off "Common Sense". And all I'm telling you is, I do
try to help him, but I haven't been able to. And I will be very honest.
One thing I won't do is lie. In the last year I've had so much
sickness in my family that I could not give him one dollar.
How he's managed to survive, I don't know. God
alone knows. And he must be in God's care because how he's pulled
through his sickness and with his financial troubles, I don't know. But
that press is working. . . and every two weeks about a hundred or a
hundred-fifty-thousand of "Common Sense" go out with a new message. And
if that information could be multiplied. . . if people that now get it
could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty, give them around. Plow that
field. Sow those seeds, you don't know which will take root, but for
God's sake, this is our last chance.
(Freedman then discusses the importance of people
forgoing unnecessary purchases to 'buy more stuff', play golf, etc., and
use the money to keep "Common Sense" going. He explains that the paper
is going in debt; could be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has
the funds, having spent some $2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the
information to the American public and elected officials. He then asks
for questions from the audience.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible]
Freedman: All right, I'll comment on that. This is
rather deep, but you all have a very high degree of intelligence, so I'm
going to make an attempt. In the time of Bible history, there was a
geographic area known as Judea. Judea was a province of the Roman
Empire. Now, a person who lived in Judea was known as a Judean, and in
Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius. Those are the two words,
in Greek and Latin, for a Judean.
Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as
'j', and the first syllable of Judaeus and Judaius starts 'ghu'. Now,
when the Bible was written, it was first written in Greek, Latin,
Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic... all those languages. Never Was the word
Jew in any of them because the word didn't exist. Judea was the
country, and the people were Judeans, and Jesus was referred to only as a
Judean. I've seen those early... the earliest scripts available.
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England
thought that it was time to translate the Bible into English. There was
no English edition of the Bible because who the Devil could read? It
was only the educated church people who could read Latin and Greek,
Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages. Anyhow, Wycliffe translated
the Bible into English. But in it, he had to look around for some words
for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word because Judea had passed
out of existence. There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten
that. So in the first translation he used the word, in referring to
Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew". At the time, there was no printing press.
Then, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the
press came into use, that word passed through so many changes... I have
them all here. If you want I can read them to you. I will. That word
'gyu' which was in the Wycliffe Bible became. . . first it was ' gyu ',
then ' giu ', then ' iu ' (because the ' i ' in Latin is pronounced
like the ' j '. Julius Caesar is ' Iul ' because there is no 'j' in
Latin) then ' iuw ', then ' ieuu ', then ' ieuy ', then ' iwe ',
then ' iow ', then ' iewe ', all in Bibles as time went on. Then '
ieue ', then ' iue ', then ' ive ', and then ' ivw ', and finally in
the 18th century... ' jew '. Jew.
All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius,
and Judaeas in Latin. Now, there was no such thing as 'Jew', and any
theologian — I've lectured in maybe 20 of the most prominent theological
seminaries in this country, and two in Europe — there was no such word
as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus was a Judean and the first
English use of a word in an English bible to describe him was 'gyu' —
Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus, just the same as we
call a laboratory a 'lab', and gasoline 'gas'... a tendency to short up.
So, in England there were no public schools;
people didn't know how to read; it looked like a scrambled alphabet so
they made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you
can't harm the Jews, is just ridiculous. I'd like to know where in the
scriptures it says that. I'd like to know the text.
Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews.
What would you, as a citizen of the United States, do to people who
did to you what the so-called Jews — the Pollacks and Litvaks and
Litzianers — they weren't Jews, as I just explained to you. They were
Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to Talmudism. There was no such
thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this
religion known in Bible history as Torah [inaudible]. No Jew or no
educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn't exist. They pulled
it out of the air. . . a meaningless word.
Just like 'anti-Semitic'. The Arab is a Semite.
And the Christians talk about people who don't like Jews as
anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-Semites. The only
Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn't one Jew who's a Semite.
They're all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european Jews. So,
they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this
reverend who told you these things, I'll convince him and it'll be one
step in the right direction. I'll go wherever I have to go to meet him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, ma'am. Well... I can answer that. First of all,
your first premise is wrong. Your first premise that all the Jews are
loyal to each other is wrong. Because, the Eastern European Jews
outnumber all the rest by so many that they create the impression that
they are the Jewish 'race'; that they are the Jewish nation; that they
are the Jewish people. . . and the Christians swallow it like a cream
puff.
But in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference
of rabbis from all over the world for the purpose of abolishing the Kol
Nidre from the Day of Atonement religious ceremony. In Brunswick,
Germany, where that conference was held in 1844, there was almost a
terrific riot. A civil war.
The Eastern Europeans said, "What the hell. We
should give up Kol Nidre? That gives us our grip on our people. We
give them a franchise so they can tell the Christians, 'Go to hell.
We'll make any deal you want', but they don't have to carry it out.
That gives us our grip on our people". So, they're not so united, and
if you knew the feeling that exists. . .
Now, I'll also show you from an official document
by the man responsible for. . . uh, who baptized this race. Here is a
paper that we obtained from the archives of the Zionist organization in
New York City, and in it is the manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who —
on behalf of the British Cabinet — negotiated the deal with these
Zionists.
And in here he says that all the jews in England
were against it. The Jews who had been there for years, the [inaudible -
probably Sephardim], those who had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch
ancestry... who were monotheists and believed in that religious belief.
That was while the Eastern European Jews were still running around in
the heart of Asia and then came into Europe. But they had no more to do
with them than. . . can we talk about a Christian 'race'? or a
Christian religion?... or are the Christians united?
So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I'll
show you in this same document that when they went to France to try and
get the French government to back that Zionist venture, there was only
one Jew in France who was for it. That was Rothschild, and they did it
because they were interested in the oil and the Suez Canal
————————————————————————
[Question inaudible] Freedman: You know why? Because
if they don't, they're decked up. They come around and they tell you
how much you must give, and if you don't . . . oh, you're anti-Semitic.
Then none of their friends will have anything to do with them, and they
start a smear campaign. . . and you have got to give.
In New York city, in the garment center, there are
twelve manufacturers in the building. And when the drive is on to sell
Israel Bonds, the United Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with
the names of the firms and opposite them, as you make the amount they
put you down for, they put a gold star after the name. Then, the buyers
are told, "When you come into that building to call on someone and they
haven't got a gold star, tell them that you won't buy from them until
they have the gold star". BLACKMAIL. I don't know what else you can
call it.
Then what do they do? They tell you it's for
'humanitarian purposes' and they send maybe $8 billion dollars to
Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if they hadn't sent that eight
billion dollars to Israel, seven billion of it would have gone into the
U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens? That seven billion
dollars deficit — that air pocket — the gullible Christians have to make
up.
They put a bigger tax on gasor
bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to pay the housekeeping expenses
for the government. So why do you let these people send their money
over there to buy guns to drive people out of their ancient homeland?
And you say, "Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no place to go and
they've been persecuted all their lives". They've never been persecuted
for their religion. And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here to
challenge me. Never once, in all of history, have they been persecuted
for their religion.
Do you know why the Jews were driven out of
England? King Edward the First in 1285 drove them out, and they never
came back until the Cromwell Revolution which was financed by the
Rothschilds. For four-hundred years there wasn't a Jew. But do you
know why they were driven out? Because in the Christian faith and the
Moslem faith it's a sin to charge 'rent' for the use of money. In other
words - what we call interest [usury] is a sin.
So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they
charged so much interest, and when the Lords and Dukes couldn't pay,
they [Jews] foreclosed. And they were creating so much trouble that the
king of England finally made himself their partner, because when they
they came to foreclose, some of these dukes bumped off the Jews. . . the
money-lenders. So the king finally said — and this is all in history,
look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke, the History of the Jews in
England; two books you can find in your library. When the king found
out what the trouble was all about, and how much money they were making,
he declared himself a fifty-percent partner of the money lenders.
Edward the First. And for many years, one-third of the revenues of the
British Treasury came from the fifty-percent interest in money-lending
by the Jews.
But it got worse and worse. So much worse that
when the Lords and Dukes kept killing the money-lenders, the King then
said, "I declare myself the heir of all the money-lenders. If they're
killed you have to pay me, because I'm his sole heir". That made so
much trouble, because the King had to go out and collect the money with
an army, so he told the Jews to get out. There were 15,000 of them, and
they had to get out, and they went across to Ireland, and that's how
Ireland got to be part of the United Kingdom.
When King Edward found out what they were doing,
he decided to take Ireland for himself before someone else did. He sent
Robert Southgard with a mercenary army and conquered Ireland. So, show
me one time where a Jew was persecuted in any country because of his
religion. It has never happened. It's always their impact on the
political, social, or economic customs and traditions of the community
in which they settle.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible] Freedman: Yes, sir. Well, they
say most of those things themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin
Franklin to say it. Most of those things they say themselves. But
Benjamin Franklin observed, and by hearsay understood, what was
happening in Europe.
When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually
surrounded the Khazar Kingdom, and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do
Khazars fled to Western Europe and brought with them the very things to
which you object and I object and a lot of other people object. The
customs, the habits, the instincts with which they were endowed.
When Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews
because that's the name that they went by, and when the Christians first
heard that these people who were fleeing from Russia — who they were —
that they had practiced this Talmudic faith — the Christians in Western
Europe said, "They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!"
And Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the
Jews, said that — and he's probably as good an authority on that subject
as there is. So when Ben Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century,
he already saw the results of what these people had done after they left
their homeland. And every word of it is true... they say it
themselves. I can give you half a dozen books they've written in which
they say the same thing: When they have money they become tyrants. And
when they become defeated, they become ruthless. They're only
barbarians. They're the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and they will do
anything to accomplish their purpose.
What right did they have to take over Russia the
way they did? The Czar had abdicated nine or ten months before that.
There was no need for them. . . they were going to have a
constitutional monarchy. But they didn't want that. When the
constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November, they mowed them all
down and established the Soviet Union.
There was no need for that. But they thought,
"Now is the time", and if you you will look in the Encyclopedia
Britannica under the word 'Bolshevism', you'll find the five laws there
that Lenin put down for a successful revolution. One of them is, "Wait
for the right time, and then give them everything you've got". It would
pay you to read that.
You'd also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who
wrote the article for the Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews
conceived and created and cultivated the Communist movement. And that
their energy made them the spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree
wrote it and no one knew more about Communism than he. And the
Encyclopedia Britannica for 25 years has been printing it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible] Freedman: Well, I can't advocate
that you do anything that's criminal, but I can tell you this. You can
start what I call an endless chain. If you can get your friends to
write, objectively, here is the statement: Mr. Kennedy's office gave me
this himself. Mr. Smith, who succeeded Mr. Kennedy, took over his
office — was in his office — and gave me this. He delivered this on the
25th, and it says here:
"For release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th". "Israel is here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the Democratic Party. The White House must take the lead. American intervention. We will act promptly and decisively against any nation in the Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both Israel and the Arab states our guarantee that we will act with whatever force and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation".
Well, do you call the return of people to their
homeland [the Arab Palestinians] aggression? Is Mr. Kennedy going to do
that? Suppose three million Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six
million Texans into the deserts of Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose
these Mexicans were slipped in there armed — the Texans were disarmed —
and one night they drove them all out of Texas and declared themselves
the Republic of the Alamo. What would the United States say?
Would we say it's aggression for these Texans to
try to get their homes back from the Mexican thieves? Suppose the
Negroes in Alabama were secretly armed by the Soviets and overnight they
rose up and drove all the whites into the swamps of Mississippi and
Georgia and Florida. . . drove them out completely, and declared
themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic of something-or-other.
Would we call it aggression if these people, the whites of Alabama,
tried to go back to their homes?
Would we. . . what would we think if the soviet
Union said, "No, those Negroes now occupy them! Leave them there!", or
"No, those Mexicans are in Texas. they declared themselves a sovereign
state. Leave them there. You have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada.
Settle somewhere else".
Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites
or the Texans wanted to go back to their homes? So now, you've got to
write to President Kennedy and say, "We do not consider it aggression in
the sense that you use the word, if these people want to return to
their homes as the United Nations — fifteen times in the last twelve
years — called upon the Zionists in occupation of Palestine to allow the
Arab Palestinians to return to their former homes and farms".
[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given
in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde
McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.]Benjamin Freedman audio/follow in the reading
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave, drop a line or two...it will be very much appreciated; it gives me feedback on your intake.